Chief Justice John Marshall in 1826. Marshall served on the Supreme Court for 34 years. He remains ane of the most honored members in Courtroom history. During his tenure (1801–1835), the Courtroom vastly expanded the function of the national authorities, broadly interpreted the enumerated powers in the Constitution, and limited the reach of the Offset Subpoena to actions of the national government. (Image via The Drove of the Supreme Court of the United states. Artist: Rembrandt Peale)

John Marshall (1755–1835), the fourth chief justice of the Usa, served on the Supreme Court for 34 years. He is the longest serving master justice in Court history. He remains one of the most honored members in Court history. During his tenure (1801–1835), the Court vastly expanded the role of the national government at the expense of states' rights advocates and broadly interpreted the legislative, executive, and judicial powers that the founders had enumerated in the Constitution.

The Court under Marshall's leadership limited the reach of the First Amendment (and other provisions of the Beak of Rights) to actions of the national regime. However, by establishing the office of the Court as a co-equal branch of government, Marshall laid the groundwork for this institution to protect First Amendment rights in the future, after they were as well applied to usa through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Marshall worked extensively in the early American government

Built-in in Germantown, Virginia, to Thomas and Mary Marshall, John Marshall was one of xv children. He was largely educated past his male parent at dwelling. He briefly attended a serial of law lectures at the Higher of William and Mary and passed the Virginia bar in 1780. This cursory menstruum of instruction reinforced the knowledge he had gained earlier in life through reading books and interacting with political leaders.

As a soldier in the American Revolution, Marshall worked extensively with George Washington and held the rank of captain when he left the Continental Regular army in 1781. He served in the Virginia House of Delegates at diverse times between 1782 and 1796 and was a recorder for the Richmond City Hustings Courtroom from 1785 to 1788.

He worked with James Madison and other delegates at the Virginia Ratifying Convention in 1788 in support of the new Constitution. Marshall was amongst the more than prominent members of the Federalist Party who opposed the adoption of the Sedition Deed of 1798. He besides served as a minister to France (1797–1798), as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives (1799–1800), and equally President John Adams'southward secretarial assistant of land (1800–1801).

Chief_Justice_John_Marshall_(cropped).jpg
Primary Justice John Marshall projected a sense of power and stature in leading the high court that had been absent until his tenure. He strengthened the Court's position as coequal with the legislative and executive branches of authorities and established the Court's power of judicial review in the political organization. (Epitome via Wikimedia Eatables, Artist: Alonzo Chappel, public domain)

Marshall projected a sense of power over the Courtroom

Adams appointed Marshall every bit chief justice of the United States in 1801 later Oliver Ellsworth resigned and John Jay declined the position. As main justice, Marshall projected a sense of power and stature in leading the high court that had been absent-minded until and then. He wrote many of the Courtroom'due south decisions during his tenure as chief justice. He also strongly encouraged other justices to refrain from writing separate opinions from the decision of the Court.

Marshall fabricated the Court a coequal branch and established judicial review

Marshall's ingenious legal interpretations had two furnishings. They strengthened the Court's position as a coequal with the legislative and executive branches of regime, and they established the Court's ability of judicial review in the political organisation.

In a landmark case, Marbury v. Madison (1803), Marshall ruled that acts of Congress tin can be reviewed and struck down if the Court deems them to be unconstitutional. This ability of judicial review immune Marshall to substantiate the Court'south power by ruling that department 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was void and violated Article three of the Constitution. Without this power, the provisions inside the First Subpoena and elsewhere in the Bill of Rights would not take had nearly the impact they have had in American history.

Marshall reinforced the national goverment'south power over the states

Marshall'due south legal skill further reinforced the national authorities's power over u.s.a.. The Supreme Court'southward decision in McCulloch 5. Maryland (1819), upholding the constitutionality of the national bank, broadly interpreted the "necessary and proper" clause of Article 1, section 8 of the Constitution. Marshall believed this clause provided the footing for boosted "implied powers" to belong to Congress, and he did non believe that states had the power to frustrate such powers by taxing federal institutions.

When Marshall was principal justice, the First Subpoena and other provisions of the Bill of Rights were understood to limit just the national government. Marshall affirmed this agreement in Barron five. Baltimore (1833), where he argued that the purpose of the Bill of Rights had been to limit the national government rather than u.s.. The Fourteenth Amendment and the doctrine of selective incorporation have extended the vast majority of the provisions in the Bill of Rights, including all provisions of the First Amendment, to land and local governments.

391px-John_Marshall,_by_Rembrandt_Peale.jpg

Principal Justice John Marshall reinforced the national goverment'southward power over u.s.a. and introduced the concept of "implied powers" in the Constitution. When Marshall was chief justice, the First Amendment and other provisions of the Bill of Rights were understood to limit only the national authorities. Withal, he Fourteenth Subpoena and the doctrine of selective incorporation have extended the vast majority of the provisions in the Bill of Rights, including all provisions of the Starting time Amendment, to state and local governments. (Image via Viriginia Museum of Fine Arts, Creative person: Rembrandt Peale, 1834, public domain)

Marshall Courtroom prepare many precedents

The Marshall Courtroom set precedents for numerous other issues, while at the same fourth dimension maintaining this dual theme of enhancing the Court'southward position and reinforcing national supremacy. Several cases dealt with the commerce clause in Article 1 of the Constitution, which vests all powers to regulate commerce in Congress.

For instance, the Fletcher five. Peck(1810) conclusion was a blow against states' rights advocates, while at the aforementioned fourth dimension it established the precedent for protecting individual property rights and contracts. Dartmouth College 5. Woodward (1819) reaffirmed the Fletcher conclusion past ruling that the Supreme Courtroom could strike downwards state laws, just it focused on those specifically related to states' regulation of corporations. In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the Court bolstered the commerce clause by prohibiting states from passing any laws that might interfere with the transportation of appurtenances beyond state lines.

One of Marshall'southward nearly notable commentaries comes from Marbury 5. Madison (1803): "The authorities of the U.s. has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and non of men. It will certainly finish to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal correct."

This article was originally published in 2009. Daniel Baracskay teaches in the public administration program at Valdosta State University.

Send Feedback on this article